Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Cazaux vs Sebastian Gima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cazaux vs Gima analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Arthur Cazaux vs Sebastian Gima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cazaux 0 - 0 Gima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cazaux has won 51.89% of points on their second serve, while Gima has won 49.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cazaux, in recent form, has won 48.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gima has won 57.17%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.47% and 34.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cazaux has saved 61.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gima has saved 59.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cazaux has won 55.36% of matches played (W/L 31/ 25), with Gima winning 56.1% (W/L 46/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cazaux has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 74% (W/L 87/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15). Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Cazaux has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10), where as Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.7% of matches (W/L 40/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cazaux has played against opponents with an average rank of 225.86 while Gima has played against players with an average rank of 149.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cazaux has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gima has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cazaux has converted 36.99% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gima has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
98
Rank
74
High
21
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
540
Rank
436
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
63% (152-89)
Career Total W/L
58% (176-127)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
54% (22-19)
$466,125
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Arthur Cazaux vs Sebastian Gima For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Cazaux VS Gima
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Cazaux | Sebastian Gima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 54% (22/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (36/26) | 54% (52/44) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (324/285) | 52% (450/421) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 56% (22/17) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.75 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 226 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:46 | 1:48:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 241.88 | 145.54 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1106/1873) | 60% (1724/2853) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (843/1106) | 64% (1105/1724) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (398/767) | 49% (557/1129) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (64/173) | 44% (147/336) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (688/1886) | 43% (1282/2950) |
| Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 86% (6/1) | 38% (3/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (19/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 53% (21/40) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (8/12) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 38% (5/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 87% (23/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 13% (23/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 11% (18/2) |
Arthur Cazaux Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Giles Hussey
Player
Arthur Cazaux
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
40 of
52)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
7
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
9
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
40 of
48)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
24 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Arthur Cazaux
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Cazaux
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
79 of
128)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
49 of
79)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
37 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
60 of
128)
131
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Arthur Cazaux
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39
Total Points Won
36
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Arthur Cazaux
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 5-7 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Arthur Cazaux
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Arthur Cazaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Arthur Cazaux
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Radovan Michalik
Player
Sebastian Gima
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Alexandru Cristian Dumitru
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sebastian Gima
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Matej Dodig
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jonas Forejtek
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Vojtech Vales
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Snitari
Player
Sebastian Gima
51%
(
62 of
122)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
111)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
43%
(
26 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
47%
(
57 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Cazaux Vs Gima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Cazaux are available here and Gima photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Arthur Cazaux
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
